Outsourcing Collection Development

One of the optional readings for my Info & Society class dealt with the idea of outsourcing a library’s collection development.  This doesn’t necessarily mean sending the selection process overseas.  It simply means that a part (or the majority) of the collection development is performed by a company outside the library. (http://www.libraryjournal.com/index.asp?layout=articlePrint&articleID=CA6471081)

I can see how this idea came about, after all library budgets are continually shrinking, while the costs associated with developing and cataloging a collection are rising.  Libraries need to think creatively about ways they can cut costs while still maintaining a high level of customer service.  But is outsourcing collection development the answer? 

I don’t know if it is the answer for every library, but for a select few it may be the best thing since sliced bread.  Using an outside service for things like mass market paperbacks, popular fiction, and new-release dvds will free up a library’s collection development team and allow them focus on fine tuning the collection for the community.  The outside service might also help keep the library’s collection balanced, so that too much money isn’t spent on one topic or genre.

Unfortunately, outsourcing collection development might not work as well for some community libraries.  One librarian in the article noted that a “best seller” might not circulate very well at their library, while an obscure title will have a holds queue a mile long.  Another noted that Republican titles are very popular, but they can’t stock ONLY these titles because the library wouldn’t be representing the entire community.  These little nuances are something outside companies may not understand, which may frustrate a library and its community.

I believe that as these programs become easier to tailor, their use will probably rise.  Do you think that this is a good thing for libraries or their communities?  Why?



  1. […] Outsourcing Collection Development By daniebob One of the optional readings for my Info & Society class dealt with the idea of outsourcing a library’s collection development. This doesn’t necessarily mean sending the selection process overseas. It simply means that a part (or the … danieBOB’s Weblog – https://daniebob.wordpress.com […]

  2. Outsourcing has been the answer on almost every business that is cutting short on budget or things like that. In of the library really needs some help and are cutting short of their budgets then Outsourcing could really help.

  3. Outsourcing is best bet for four reasons:
    One: Outsourcing is cost effective and saves you money
    Two: Outsourcing can help you share risk
    Three: Outsourcing can help accommodate peak loads
    Four: Outsourcing can help develop your internal staff

    Offshore Outsourcing Expert

  4. Outsourcing is optimized by constant input by branch staff. There is room for unique items for library users. Branches have a obligation when the selection is centralized to make sure that new titles are looked at when they arrive. Just because you don’t order doesn’t mean you cannot know what is in your collection, eh. And, have ears to the ground when your customers are saying what they want so you can give feedback to selectors.

  5. Outsourcing has been around as long work interest is existed. And many companies today that began employing the outsourcing market so that it will carry out the functions of the data entry.

  6. That’s a good point Susan, and one that I brought up in my class discussions. Many of the libraries that outsource their collection development (CD) withold a portion of their CD budget to tweak/supplement their orders.

    Several of my classmates brought up concerns about making sure that the companies we outsource to aren’t getting kickbacks from the publishers. Others expressed concern about creating “cookie cutter” libraries.

  7. hello there! you really have an interesting post. You’re inputs are great and you have good ideas in showing or should I say expressing your thoughts to us. I learn something from your post. Keep it up!

  8. Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation 🙂 Anyway … nice blog to visit.

    cheers, Faddist.

  9. Dear Author daniebob.wordpress.com !
    Bravo, your phrase simply excellent

  10. hello,

    i registered because i think this is the right place for me.

    bye 🙂

    competitive intelligence

  11. Thanks for sharing the link, but argg it seems to be down… Does anybody have a mirror or another source? Please reply to my post if you do!

    I would appreciate if someone here at daniebob.wordpress.com could post it.


  12. Hi, I can’t understand how to add your site in my rss reader. Can you Help me, please

  13. Super-Duper site! I am loving it!! Will come back again – taking you feeds also, Thanks.

Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  • April 2008
    S M T W T F S
    « Mar   May »
  • Archives